The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART) as treatment for HIV infection has greatly improved mortality and morbidity for adults and adolescents living with HIV around the world. Deciding which treatment regimen to begin for first-line treatment in ART-naïve patients, however, remains a significant challenge. Two commonly used medications are tenofovir (TDF) and zidovudine (AZT). The purpose of this review was to assess which of these two medications was the best for initial treatment for people living with HIV, and through our search we identified two randomised controlled trials. We did not find any critical difference between the two medications in regards to serious adverse events or virologic response, but did find that TDF is superior to AZT in terms of immunologic response and adherence and more frequent emergence of resistance. However, these two studies are not directly comparable because they used two related different drugs in addition to TDF and AZT. Future studies and recommendations should focus on specific toxicities and tolerability when comparing these two medications.
Comparing initial antiretroviral regimens tenofovir or zidovudine as part of three-drug combinations for treatment of HIV infection
Have your say!
'Your views on The Cochrane Library: survey'
Published Online:
February 16, 2011
Health topics:
More like this
- EFV and NVP are both equally effective in the suppression of HIV infection when compared as part of a three-drug combination.
- Comparing initial antiretroviral regimens stavudine or zidovudine as part of three-drug combinations for treatment of HIV infection
- Antiretroviral regimens for patients with HIV who fail first-line antiretroviral therapy
- Antiretrovirals for reducing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection
- Stavudine, lamivudine and nevirapine combination therapy for treatment of HIV infection and AIDS in adults
