Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancer

Lv D, Wang X, Shi G

Published Online:

June 16, 2010

Gynaecological cancers lead to a significant amount of morbidity and mortality internationally. In recent years, a trend towards new perioperative care strategies has been documented. These "Fast Track (FT) surgery", or "Enhanced Recovery Programmes" replace traditional approaches in surgical care management. The FT multimodal programmes may enhance the postoperative recovery period by reducing surgical stress. The review authors found no high quality studies to support or refute the use of perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients.

Abstract (click to read)

Background:

Gynaecological malignancies contribute to 10 to 15% of cancers in women internationally. In recent years, a trend towards new perioperative care strategies has been documented as "Fast Track (FT) surgery", or "Enhanced Recovery Programmes" to replace some traditional approaches in surgical care. The FT multimodal programmes may enhance the postoperative recovery by means of reducing surgical stress. This systematic review aims to fully assess the beneficial and harmful effects of FT programmes in gynaecological cancer care.

Objectives:

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of FT programmes in gynaecological cancer care.

Search strategy:

We searched the following databases, The Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Collaborative Review Group's Trial Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 4, 2009, MEDLINE and EMBASE to November 2009. In addition, all reference lists of included trials were searched and experts in the gynaecological oncology community were contacted in an attempt to locate trials.

Selection criteria:

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any type of FT programmes for surgery in gynaecological cancer to conventional recovery strategies were included.

Data collection and analysis:

Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion. Since no RCTs were identified, data collection and analysis could not be performed.

Main results:

No studies were found that met the inclusion criteria.

Authors' conclusions:

We currently have no evidence from high quality studies to support or refute the use of perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients. Further well-designed RCTs with standard FT programmes are needed.

This record should be cited as:

Lv D, Wang X, Shi G. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD008239. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub2

Assessed as up to date:

May 11, 2010

Find the research

Get full text at The Cochrane Library

Primary Review Group:

Gynaecological Cancer Group

Health topics:

Cancer > Gynaecological > Supportive care

Gynaecology > Cancer > Supportive care

Cochrane Summaries^beta

Independent high-quality evidence for health care decision making

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancer

More like this

Copyright © 2012 - The Cochrane Collaboration