Cochrane Summariesbeta

Independent high-quality evidence for health care decision making

Comparison of different modes of cardiac rehabilitation

Taylor RS, Dalal H, Jolly K, Moxham T, Zawada A
Published Online: 
June 16, 2010

Heart disease is one of the most common causes of premature death and ill health. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) aims to restore people with heart disease to health through a combination of exercise with education and psychological support. Traditionally centre-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes (e.g. either based within a hospital, gymnasium or a sport centre setting) are offered to individuals after cardiac events, while home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes have been introduced in an attempt to widen access and participation. The aim of this review has been to determine the effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes compared with supervised centre-based cardiac rehabilitation.

The study population in the trials were mainly male with a mean age of 52-69 years. Study findings indicate that both home and hospital-based interventions are similar in their benefits on risk factors, health-related quality of life, death, clinical events and costs. There was some weak evidence to suggest that home-based interventions were associated with a higher level of adherence.

The limitations of the review are that the recruitment of the included trials was limited to stable coronary heart disease patients either following an acute-MI or revascularization, but no other cardiac populations, such as heart failure. There has been considerable diversity in the variety of centre-based and home-based cardiac rehabilitation interventions.

Related reviews, including four other Cochrane reviews, can be looked at for a fuller picture of a broader review and more conclusions about cardiac rehabilitation and the effectiveness of its specific contributant interventions and in CHD and heart failure populations.

Find the research