Cochrane Summariesbeta

Independent high-quality evidence for health care decision making

No major difference between the various surgical interventions for Anorectal fistula used as far as recurrence rates are concerned.

Jacob TJ, Perakath B, Keighley MR.B
Published Online: 
May 12, 2010

Anorectal fistula is a common surgical problem. The anorectal fistula can be treated by various surgical options. The common surgical options for rectal fistulae are
a) to lay open the fistula tract (fistulotomy), or
b) to pass a seton (a thread, wire or tube that stimulates the body to extrude it and ultimately heal the fistula), or
c) to primarily remove the fistula (fistulectomy) and repair the defect in the muscle and the anus with an anorectal myo-mucosal advancement flap.
Other treatment modalities used less frequently include fibrin glue and ayurvedic drugs incorporated into setons. The optimal surgical treatment for anorectal fistulae is associated with low recurrence rates, minimal incontinence and a good quality of life.

The reviewers identified 10 trials that compare various fistula treatments against one another. There are various parameters that these procedures can be compared on, but we looked at the two most important ones, recurrence (the numbers who got the disease again) and incontinence (a worsening in the ability to control rectal content).

In the trials that were compared, there was no significant difference between the various comparisons for the disease to recur. However the trials on fibrin glue, as well as data from non randomised trials show that incontinence is less, probably as there is no surgical disruption of the anal muscle.

There is a paucity of good quality data that compares various types of operative treatment for anorectal fistula and there is scope for further trials in the area.

Find the research