Data collection and analysis:
Two reviewers independently inspected citations and, where possible, abstracts. We ordered papers, inspected and quality assessed them. We extracted data, again working independently. If loss to follow up was greater than 50% we considered results as 'prone to bias'. For dichotomous data we calculated the relative risk (RR), the 95% confidence interval (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat/harm (NNT/H) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD).
This record should be cited as:
Hartung B, Wada M, Laux G, Leucht S. Perphenazine for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD003443. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003443.pub2