Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic disorder of unknown cause that is progressive and leads to death. Existing evidence about the treatment of IPF is difficult to interpret because of evolving diagnostic criteria and classification schemes, grouping together diverse entities with markedly different natural histories and responses to therapy. Therefore, because the old studies did not include only IPF patients, their results cannot be extended to IPF as they are currently defined. In addition, methodologic problems mainly related to the lack of randomized placebo-controlled treatment trials have made evidence-based conclusions difficult. A systematic search for high quality placebo-controlled randomised trials comparing corticosteroid treatment with placebo in subjects with a diagnosis of IPF was unable to identify any studies suitable for inclusion in the review.
Currently there is no evidence to support the routine use of corticosteroids alone in the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Have your say!
'Your views on The Cochrane Library: survey'
Published Online:
February 17, 2010
Health topics:
More like this
- Combination therapy of inhaled steroids and long-acting beta-agonists versus long-acting beta-agonists alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Long-acting beta2-agonists versus placebo in addition to inhaled corticosteroids in children and adults with chronic asthma
- Combination therapy of inhaled steroids and long-acting beta-agonists versus inhaled steroids alone
- The addition of long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled steroids compared to higher doses of inhaled steroids alone as maintenance treatment for chronic asthma
- There is little evidence to support the use of drugs to improve outcomes in adults with lung injury
