Not enough evidence that low-molecular-weight heparin is more effective than vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of blood clots in veins (venous thromboembolism). Blood clots sometimes cause blockages in veins after surgery, bed rest, or spontaneously. These clots can be fatal, when they end up in the lungs. Vitamin K antagonists are effective in preventing renewed blood clot formation, by thinning the blood. Low-molecular-weight heparin is a drug that also thins the blood but is expensive. Pregnant women or people with an increased risk of major bleeding cannot take vitamin K antagonists. The review of trials found insufficient evidence of differences in the safety and effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin compared to vitamin K antagonists. More research is needed into the long-term treatment of blood clots in veins.
Vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin for the long term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism
Have your say!
'Your views on The Cochrane Library: survey'
Published Online:
March 16, 2011
Health topics:
More like this
- Interventions for preventing venous thromboembolism in adults undergoing knee arthroscopy
- New types of anticoagulants to prevent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following total hip or knee replacement surgery
- Once versus twice daily injections of low molecular weight heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism
- A fixed daily dose of a low molecular weight heparin compared with an adjusted dose of unfractionated heparin for treating blood clots in the deep veins (venous thromboembolism)
- Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism
